OpenBCM V1.07b11 (WIN32)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DBO595

[LAU JN59RM]

 Login: GAST





  

NL2ZTM > BPQ32    05.02.16 21:22l 121 Lines 5142 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 10100_NL3ZTM
Read: GAST
Subj: Fwd: Re: [BPQ32] Re: Reject Lists
Path: DBO595<BX0RBL<FRA199<FRA485<FRB001<NL3BSM<NL3ZZE<NL3ZTM
Sent: 160205/0812Z 10100@NL3ZTM.ZH.NLD.EU BPQ1.4.65




-------- Doorgestuurd bericht --------
Onderwerp: 	Re: [BPQ32] Re: Reject Lists
Datum: 	Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:31:30 -0500
Van: 	KA9LCF ka9lcf@yahoo.com [BPQ32] <BPQ32@yahoogroups.com>
Antwoord-naar: 	BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
Aan: 	BPQ32@yahoogroups.com



I am pretty certain that amateur radio operators who go through the 
trouble, expense and exposure of setting up a BBS do not have intentions 
of rejecting anyone but the most offensive or, reasonably so, illegal 
operators.  And with exception of the illegal operators, those that 
border on violations of decorum, would not be excluded without the SYSOP 
having first sent warnings or at least a reply to state the reason(s) 
for the exclusion outright.  I am also fairly certain that once that 
exclusion was implemented that if the excluded party were to offer 
explanation or assurance to discontinue the offenses for the exclusion, 
the SYSOP would reverse it.

Part of what has been missing from this discussion on rejection, is for 
everyone to remember that we are all guests of someone's station.  What 
might be okay for one system administrator, might be taboo for another; 
there is no rule that says any station must operate at the behest of 
another.  Repeater trustees have the authority to issue a cease and 
desist order to any amateur of the system under their trust.  The FCC 
has been quite clear on this and will back up the repeater 
owner/trustee.  The same applies to BBS administrators.

Just my two bits (used to be 2 cents, but rates have gone up).

73,
Bradd - KA9LCF


This brings us all back to remembering to have fun and enjoy, but to 
also be mindful of your content so as to assure it is in keeping with 
Amateur Radio decorum.

On 2/4/2016 10:25 AM, charles brabham n5pvl@uspacket.org [BPQ32] wrote:
>
> We hear platitudes about how BBS SYSOPs who do or do not want to 
> participate in non-ham links ought to be able to do so. - The only way 
> to effectively do so however, requires an ability to isolate one type 
> of network (ham) from the other (non-ham).
>
> I suspect this is the real reason why there has ever been any 
> resistance to an ability to reject by callsign.
>
> 73 DE Charles, N5PVL
>
>
> On 2/4/2016 12:17 AM, ag6qo@yahoo.com [BPQ32] wrote:
>>
>> John,
>> I believe that times have changed and that in order to make it 
>> reasonable to prevent illegal use of our stations, whether intended 
>> or not, this sort of user lockout is valuable.
>>
>> To be effective, it has to work not only for BPQmail, but for the 
>> node as well. For RF connections as well as AXIP.
>>
>> While there will always be some power-drunk sysops who would abuse 
>> such a feature, I believe they would not readily attract users anyway.
>>
>> I'd much rather see a community of enabled amateurs encouraging each 
>> other to provide connections, without worry of breaking some law.
>>
>> By the way, I am finding the L4 logging very useful already.
>> Thanks again.
>> Joe
>> AG6QO
>>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email> 	This email has been sent from a 
> virus-free computer protected by Avast.
> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email>
>

__._,_.___
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by: KA9LCF <ka9lcf@yahoo.com>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply via web post 
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/BPQ32/conversations/messages/18793;_ylc=X3oDMTJycjdhdGpkBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE1Njk5MTI3BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MzEwOARtc2dJZAMxODc5MwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNycGx5BHN0aW1lAzE0NTQ2MTA2NzE-?act=reply&messageNum=18793> 
	• 	Reply to sender 
<mailto:ka9lcf@yahoo.com?subject=Re%3A%20%5BBPQ32%5D%20Re%3A%20Reject%20Lists> 
	• 	Reply to group 
<mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com?subject=Re%3A%20%5BBPQ32%5D%20Re%3A%20Reject%20Lists> 
	• 	Start a New Topic 
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/BPQ32/conversations/newtopic;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMjQyaTRuBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE1Njk5MTI3BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MzEwOARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBjBHN0aW1lAzE0NTQ2MTA2NzE-> 
	• 	Messages in this topic 
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/BPQ32/conversations/topics/18755;_ylc=X3oDMTM3ajZiZW92BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE1Njk5MTI3BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MzEwOARtc2dJZAMxODc5MwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawN2dHBjBHN0aW1lAzE0NTQ2MTA2NzEEdHBjSWQDMTg3NTU-> 
(26)

Visit Your Group 
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/BPQ32/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMGZrdXBqBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE1Njk5MTI3BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MzEwOARzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTQ2MTA2NzE-> 


  * New Members
    <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/BPQ32/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnZGFrOGI5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE1Njk5MTI3BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MzEwOARzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDU0NjEwNjcx>
    9

Yahoo! Groups 
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbzVmMzNmBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzE1Njk5MTI3BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MzEwOARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1NDYxMDY3Mg--> 

• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> 
• Unsubscribe 
<mailto:BPQ32-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> • Terms 
of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

..

__,_._,___





Lese vorherige Mail | Lese naechste Mail


 26.03.2026 16:09:06lZurueck Nach oben